, 2015; Cardoso and you may Souza, 2016; Santiago and Saliba, 2016; dos Santos and Jalalzai, 2021). Within works we are going to manage misogyny since acknowledged by our very own interviewees relating to Rousseff’s six ages from inside the fuel, particularly focusing on the connection ranging from misogynistic backlash therefore the gendered twice join fictional character understood. Regarding following the area we offer a more nuanced meaning getting each one of the subcategories known (look for Dining table 2), bringing stand-by yourself meanings and instances from the study together with descriptive analyses away from trick times inside Rousseff’s presidency you to definitely exemplify the fresh active between the nuanced proposition getting analyzing the gendered twice join, misogynist backlash, and its own issues to your Rousseff’s presidency.
The new five subcategories understood starred in the information on varying levels (find Dining tables step three, 4). A couple of templates starred in highest ratio: Investigations in order to Men and you may Misogynyments themed due to the fact analysis to men searched in the nearly half of the interviews and depicted thirty six percent out-of all of the comments codifiedments inspired since misogyny had been the vast majority of statements (38 per cent) and starred in forty two per cent of all the interview. Simply put, interviewees was really aware from Rousseff’s character while the chairman compared for other men politicians and you may previous presidents, plus the suggests Rousseff is actually punished through the their unique administration on account of gendered expectation and you can backlash.
When you find yourself appearing that have reduced regularity regarding the interviews, the other several layouts give essential framework to facts you can sexist backlash in presidency regarding Brazil’s first woman chairman. Talks on how Rousseff made an effort to follow gendered criterion ascribed to help you women (Complying on the Twice Bind) appeared in over ten percent of the remark coded and interviews held. Meanwhile, talk about how precisely Rousseff confronted the latest gendered hopes of their heta sexiga svarta kvinnor status (Challenging the fresh new Twice Bind) appeared in more one to fifth of all the interviews, constituting 16 % of the many statements coded.
This new dysfunction of one’s numerical thickness of one’s thematic research will bring a kick off point in order to good qualitative research each and every motif, centering on the connection between each theme, particularly the union between the three templates myself linked to new gendered double bind (review, complying, and you can problematic) together with misogynistic backlash you to used.
Comparison in order to dudes
Among the many subcategories known was reviews of Dilma Rousseff in order to guys, both researching Rousseff so you’re able to men people in politics and you can discussing how anything could be different if the Rousseff have been one. Thus, i unearthed that there was both a conceptual parts and standard component to her testing so you can men. During the a conceptual experience, we quite often watched the term, “when the she had been one” to spell it out exactly how a posture would have starred away in different ways got Dilma maybe not already been a lady. The fresh story depicted inside our interview was from a network you to “favors dudes” (Respondent 88, ), which have “no open gender discrimination, although fact that [a great politician] is actually a person is actually an advantage” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever discussing that it comparison more concretely, discover a watch Rousseff’s rough identity, the fresh new “hard woman up to tender dudes.” The latest estimate below brings significantly more framework:
Talks from the Rousseff’s impeachment and also the sexism and you may misogyny at the rear of the latest process had been discussed for the common mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you will Kaiser, 2016) and also in scholarly work (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Yes, and so they asserted that she try a hard people, you to she cannot communicate with some body, one to she had an enthusiastic authoritarian way of speaking. Whatever for men looks like a supplement “no, they are a hard individual, a personal-convinced individual that understands just what the guy desires.” In order to their particular try demonstrated since bad “no, she doesn’t can cam, she is difficult, she actually is which” within the a bad ways. The way they communicate with united states, feminine. We have reached a specific status, our company is are severe, our company is deviating off to how to become a woman, who’s sweet, transparent, quiet and for example. The form of Dilma are is the types of ladies who be able to become strong contained in this a completely patriarchal industry, up against this order you to definitely is present (Respondent 79, ).