Brand new improvement alarmed brand new elimination of the following facts: 1, dos, 4, 6, thirteen, fifteen, 18, 20, twenty two, 23, twenty-five and you will twenty-seven. Hence, once getting rid of these things, Model dos(b) attained optimum thinking having goodness- of- fit indicator. New FJS constructed 15 activities, at which the worldwide Squared Multiple Correlations (SMC) directory try .sixty, exhibiting you to definitely sixty% of your variance try said of the latent situations. The correlation ranging from Factor step 1 and you may Factor 2 is actually .66, it had been .80 between Basis dos and you may Grounds 3, and you may try .75 ranging from Basis step 1 and Grounds step 3, showing the relationship involving the about three products (Shape step one). Standardized loads varied out-of .64 (items 24) in order to .84 (product 22).
To possess Factor step 1, Ordinal’s alpha is .94 and you can McDonald’s Omega are .93. Basis dos achieved a keen Ordinal leader value of .95 and McDonald’s Omega is actually .92. And you can Foundation 3 got a reliability value of .ninety to possess Ordinal’s alpha and you may .88 to possess McDonald’s Omega.
First, Pearson correlations was carried out within FJS size and you will socio-group variables. Gender is actually in the FJS- Foundation dos (Lover vigilance), in which female said large score (M= , SD = 6.15) than simply guys (M = 9.94, SD = 5.94). not, to deal with this dilemma rigorously, an invariance investigation is conducted, leading to compliance having metric invariance with similar CFI thinking (.92) for both the non-evaluate model and adjusted design 1. At exactly the same time, the essential difference between model 1 loads and you can model dos intercepts and you can restrictions and Spanish women dating white man you may design 3 architectural covariance differed because of the beliefs below 0.05 (model step 1 = .92; model dos = .ninety and model step 3 = .90). Fundamentally, more frequent Facebook use is connected with an elevated quantity of Facebook jealousy (Table 5).
The outcomes showed that their twenty seven affairs shaped a great around three-factor build (Companion Passion, Mate Vigilance, and you will Partner’s Intimate and you may Sexual relationships) and this brand new leader wouldn’t improve if any goods was removed
Secondly, the latest relationships anywhere between FJS proportions as well as the dimensions of RPCS, self-value, and romantic jealousy were checked-out. The outcome gotten showed that each other RPCS-Partnership and you may RPCS-Reduction have been adversely associated with about three FJS points. In the end, self-regard and you can close jealousy synchronised surely on about three FJS issues (Table 5). Also, a beneficial linear regression studies try used to raised see the fresh predictive worth of the three FJS situations on the RPCS full get, self-regard, and you may intimate jealousy. As shown in the Dining table six, the newest RPCS complete score is actually greatest predict by Foundation 2, we.e., partner vigilance, and you will care about-admiration was most useful forecast because of the Grounds step 3, lover’s intimate and you will sexual relationships, if you are romantic jealousy is actually forecast of the all the about three FJS items.
Myspace is considered the most commonly used social media within the Colombia (Statcounter, 2020), and also as there are not any forms accessible to evaluate the jealousy regarding Twitter, a portion of the goal of this research would be to adapt and verify this new FJS which have an example off Colombian anyone. Our conclusions shown your quick particular the brand new FJS into the a great Colombian attempt is actually legitimate and you will valid.
Decades correlated negatively with all around three FJS things, individuals involved in offered relationship reported lower FJS-Factor step 1 scores (companion hobby), if you are zero extreme correlations was indeed shown between matchmaking stage and FJS Points dos and step three
Concerning your factor design, on one hand, the structure of one’s measure is tested when you look at the an EFA. not, such performance didn’t correspond having early in the day knowledge, in which the structure was unifactorial (Demirtas-Madran, 2016; Muise mais aussi al., 2009). But not, from the Pakistani version of one’s FJS, new grounds design contained around three points, called of the article writers as follows: Insecurity, Inquisitiveness, and you may Infidelity (Iqbal & Jami, 2017). Additionally, in the form of brand new CFA, one-basis model advised throughout the new version (Muise mais aussi al., 2009), that was ratified in the Turkish adaptation (Demirtas-Madran, 2016) are checked-out. But not, goodness-of-complement testing did not tell you an adequate fit. Ergo, the newest multifactorial model obtained from this new EFA is examined, nevertheless model wasn’t discover to possess enough jesus off match indices.
English
Hungarian
Italian
Maltese
Polish
Spanish
