The question of one’s legality of the Rev

1857.

3rd.-The fresh new last anniversary away from Judge “Top and you can Point” An effective.O.F. is well-known of the a dinner at the Cousin. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied the newest couch, and it also are reported that the fresh new Court next contains ninety members.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you can J. Bayly is opted the newest people in the public Collection Panel.

p. 207 The human body off an excellent whale, which had been removed from the Winterton, was being demonstrated toward Chapel Ordinary.

The brand new Rev. W. D. Go, the fresh minister regarding St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before leaving Southsea, already been served with a purse away from ?61.

twenty-first.-The fresh new “Sisters” ended up being in the accident which have among brick piers regarding new Connection, it got a lot more broken.

Feb. 4th.-A keen Anti-Income tax fulfilling was actually held at the Urban area Hallway. This new Gran presided, therefore the following the participated in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you can J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared as if the fresh mover contained in this number.

Feb. 21st.-An effective “Poor’s Rates” fulfilling ended up being stored on Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you will a resolution protesting against the 1s. 6d. every quarter price is adopted. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, R. Bailey, Nichols, Lyon women dating and you will F. Starling talked about them, since make of the Guardians was defended by Mr. J. H. Harrison, among the many Panel.

Feb. 25th.-A situation which excited significant desire, got read from the Condition Courtroom, Tolhouse-hall, before Courtroom (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The newest plaintiff was Mr. John Cobb, leather vendor, to possess which Mr. C. H. Chamberlin searched; the newest defendants was basically Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you can G. D. Palmer, who had been portrayed by Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The brand new plaintiff reported that he had been a candidate towards place of work out-of Councillor on age for example within solicitation off Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and Grams. D. Palmer. At that time he turned into a candidate he distinctly advised them he wouldn’t spend off their own pouch a lot more than just ?10 to the expenditures of your election, therefore are understood your Liberal class, to which the guy belonged, perform signup the others. The evening before the election he received an estimate out-of what the expense was indeed likely to be, plus result of that he immediately saw both Mr. Burroughs and you may Mr. G. D. Palmer. One to guess, he believed, amounted in order to regarding ?45, due to the fact subscriptions entirely amounted to help you however, ?42. Shortly after specific discussion they offered to hold him harmless of your level of the costs which may exceed the sum of subscribed, in which he and you may Mr. Burroughs following went p. 208 on Panel-space of your own North-ward, where Mr. Burroughs told you that they had generated agreements due to their friend John Cobb successful the market-ward. The expenses of one’s election, which he (this new plaintiff) missing, amounted altogether to help you ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, hence, he now claimed from the defendants try ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The plaintiff, when you look at the mix-test by the Mr. Cufaude, acknowledge one to ?39 of your entire matter is actually getting – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated that when, since plaintiff said, the fresh defendants got considering him a vow on excess expenditures, the new be sure ought to have writing. And, if in case the evidence are true, hence, not, the guy debated, it actually was impossible to your plaintiff to recover, inasmuch when he themselves had invited one a corner off the whole of the expenses is to own – -, which was an unlawful operate.-Mr. Chamberlin debated your plaintiff, just after searching the fresh new pledge throughout the defendants, acted only up on the brand new trust of the guarantee, and this hence, because they had entered up on an involvement to expend the cash, they certainly were liable. The money, more over, had not been spent by the plaintiff, however, from the panel appointed so you can conduct the new election, and you will until the election is actually more than, the fresh new plaintiff wasn’t aware any of the money had started invested in the – -.-His Honour told you it was clear the brand new make certain should have become in writing. He had been out-of advice, and additionally, that plaintiff was not bound to afford the illegal costs, and consequently he may not promote their step for the money he reported.-Brand new plaintiff try, accordingly, non-correct.