Relationships deals perform often mean the period of time in the and this amarriage ought to have taken set

1. Yet ,, during the genealogy and family history, most of us knowthat for every code there is an exclusion. An effective vexing point ofgenealogy is that not one person most knows how to use the brand new conditions orrules which have people decisive adjective such as for instance constantly, possibly, probably,most likely, an such like. It might be interesting when the truth be told there most other examples ofjointures being made a-year or a few immediately after a well-known relationship time.

2. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards wedding out-of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who have been 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, after taken off the newest 5th LordClifford? Who would narrow down the marriage day.

Arthur

Allegedly, if the a dispensation are found and you will provided, it can havebeen from the among the many after the, and could appear in the new correspondingregister guide, if this endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. If your 10th Lord Clifford do wed at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas Age afterwards for the reason that season, does brand new chronology maybe not works?

John palms?

Elizabeth created in the later 1487, Henry created inside 1488/9, Joan during the ,etc. filling in this new labels of your posting from . If the (a) thechronology nonetheless works; and you can (b) their unique relationships bit was not lowest; thenwe just have the fresh 1505 pedigree regarding Henry VII’s which is during the oppositionto this new supposition that she try a valid daughter.

six. About your 1505 pedigree: Certainly are the Clifford daughters the onlyknown Henry VII relationships omitted? Are there someone else? In that case,wouldn’t one to mirror poorly on this file as a resource?

Of evaluations We have created from this new c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the newest 1480-1500 Visitation of your North pedigrees, which are

On the c.1505 Connections pedigrees, the brand new Clifford youngsters are not listedin a beneficial Clifford pedigree, but rather throughout the St. John pedigree. Once the I’mnot regularly the fresh St. John family, adopting the ‘s the pointers asit seems in the c.1505 pedigree, while the obtained from new 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. blog post. Brand new phrasing when you look at the quotations is exactly because it appears inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Off my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got around three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My personal Woman the latest King’s Mommy.” that has “The fresh King.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic partner.” she had step 3 daus & 2 sons:

An effective. “Edith, wedded so you can Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married for the Lady Margaret, dau. away from theDuke of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[an alternate child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously five college students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A beneficial Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary Kako upoznati mladu Еѕenu, wedded so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and sistren.” Which have issueindicated, not called.C2. “Elizabeth, married to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, wedded very first on the Lord Zouche; shortly after to the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated yet not entitled.

Margaret Duchess of Somerset, by the “Lionel Lord Welles, past partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”