Matrimony deals would often indicate the timeframe in hence amarriage must have chosen to take set

1. Yet ,, into the genealogy and family history, each of us knowthat for each and every code there was an exception to this rule. An excellent vexing area ofgenealogy is the fact no-one very understands how to make use of the new conditions orrules that have one definitive adjective such as for example usually, possibly, probably,most likely, an such like. It could be interesting in the event that here other examples ofjointures becoming made annually or one or two just after a known relationships time.

2. Is there an enthusiastic extant dispensation into the marriage from ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes who had been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, shortly after taken off the fresh 5th LordClifford? Who does narrow down its wedding go out.

Arthur

Presumably, in the event that a dispensation are looked for and you may supplied, it might havebeen by the one of the following, and may even appear in the https://kissbrides.com/american-women/escondido-ca/ fresh correspondingregister book, in the event it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford do marry in early 1487 [state January] andhas Age later on for the reason that 12 months, do brand new chronology not performs?

John arms?

E created in the later 1487, Henry born into the 1488/nine, Joan when you look at the ,etc. completing the fresh brands of your own post away from . When the (a) thechronology still really works; and (b) their wedding portion wasn’t reasonable; thenwe only have this new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s which is in the oppositionto the fresh supposition one she was a legitimate daughter.

six. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the fresh new onlyknown Henry VII relationships omitted? Were there anybody else? If that’s the case,won’t you to definitely reflect badly on this subject document since a source?

Away from reviews I have produced from the fresh c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the latest 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, being

Throughout the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively on St. John pedigree. Because the I’mnot accustomed the fresh new St. John family unit members, following ‘s the advice asit appears in the c.1505 pedigree, once the obtained from the new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. post. The phrasing from inside the quotations is exactly because it appears inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”From my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset got about three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman this new King’s Mom.” that has “New Queen.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest partner.” she got step three daus & 2 sons:

A great. “Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Rod out-of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded towards Woman Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke out-of Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a special child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four children:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married to Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire.”B4. “An excellent Nun off Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and sistren.” That have issueindicated, although not named.C2. “Age, wedded to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “E, wedded earliest toward Lord Zouche; just after for the LordScrope out-of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated although not named.

Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, from the “Lionel Lord Welles, past partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”