The results displayed quantities of PCM notably influenced by the kind of dating (H(2) = ; p =

Moral Factors

The ethical points was indeed guaranteed, with respect to the advice out-of Quality No. of Ministry from Fitness. Its carry out try approved by the Stability and you may Research kolla in det Chamber away from the Centro de Filosofia age Ciencias Humanas of the Universidade Federal manage Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and you may Method Zero. step three.). On the front-page of your own online survey, there’s new Free and Informed Agree Name (FICT), hence displayed factual statements about the dangers and you can benefits of answering this new analysis, therefore the be certain that regarding withdrawal away from agree, versus bias and also at when. Just those people exactly who appeared the fresh concur choice had usage of the analysis content. Those who did not check the concur choice were rerouted so you’re able to the end of the fresh new survey.

To analyze you can easily variations in PCM and you will NCM, according to sociodemographic variables: sex, career, care of younger siblings, visibility or lack of somebody, and having or otherwise not which have college students, reviews anywhere between teams were made utilising the Mann-Whitney U test ( Dining table 1).

In the 1st, the partnership ranging from PCM and you may NCM try evaluated also it is actually unearthed that PCM (Meters = ; DP = ) correlates negatively to the NCM (Yards = ; DP = ); p =

Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS _est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS _est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).

On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS _est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).

Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS _est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS _est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).

A couple of Spearman correlations was presented. 000; roentgen = -.494; r dos = .24. From the next analysis new relationships between PCM, NCM and you will 16 individual and you can contextual details were checked-out and certainly will rise above the crowd from inside the Table dos. Weakened associations were found one another positive and negative between PCM or NCM and you can twelve of the parameters examined. Specifically the newest sociodemographic parameters: “number of siblings” and you can “birth purchase” and also the identity facts: “conscientiousness” and you can “openness to play” presented no high correlations that have PCM and you may NCM.